Abstract
Since more and more
schools of teacher education all over the world are adding on-line
asynchronous discussions to their pre-teaching education requirements,
education practitioners need research to gauge their potential
contribution to the development of future teachers’ identity and, in
particular, to the development of their shared repertoire. Ryan and
Scott (Teach Teach Educ 24(6):1635–1644, 2008)
already pointed out that these discussions offer opportunities for
student teachers to link theory and practice, to identify discrepancies
between the two, to set up problems, to uncover implicit assumptions in
teaching and learning, etc. Nevertheless, we still felt the need for an
assessment of these asynchronous discussions, given that they may easily
become mere monologues where students uncritically repeat theories they
have heard in their classes or just describe what they have seen in
schools. In this chapter we analyse the discourse generated in order to
ascertain the degree of interactivity and identify instances of
negotiation of meaning. We propose that this particular type of
interaction helps to develop a shared repertoire, one of the three
characteristics of a community of practice.
No hay comentarios:
Publicar un comentario